Why did Labour Together orchestrate a smear campaign against journalists?
by
Notable Quotes
"It's a hugely defensive strategy. And that's why it matters, because it shows the character of significant people in Westminster."
"This story is about the way that the people in power react when they're facing scrutiny."
Get episode summaries just like this for all your favourite podcasts in your inbox every day!
Get More InsightsEpisode Summary
Unlock the full summary
Enter your email to read the complete summary, key takeaways and more.
Episode Summary
In this episode, The Guardian's Henry Dyer recounts the troubling actions of Labour Together, a think tank closely tied to Keir Starmer's Labour Party. After uncovering undeclared donations to Labour Together back in 2021, Dyer researched the organization, ultimately discovering that in 2023, it had commissioned a corporate intelligence firm to investigate journalists probing into its funding. The investigation led to unfounded claims that journalists were part of a Russian conspiracy.
Dyer explains how Labour Together was formed and evolved after the 2019 general election, when it aimed to position itself favorably within the party post-Corbyn. Significant donations from wealthy individuals began to flow into Labour Together, although these contributions were not reported in accordance with electoral regulations. Dyer's past reports led to some exposure of these financial misdeeds, prompting the Electoral Commission to issue fines against Labour Together for late disclosures.
Fast forward to November 2023, the Sunday Times published a report revealing that Labour Together, under the direction of Josh Simons, had engaged in covert efforts against journalists, alleging without evidence that they were aligned with Russian interests. Dyer elaborates on the smear tactics employed against specific journalists, including baseless character attacks and personal mentions, which appeared aimed at discrediting their reporting. Dyer argues that such aggressive strategies from political entities against the press are dangerous to democratic processes.
The episode culminates in discussions surrounding the implications of these actions for Starmer's leadership and the wider ethics of philanthropy in politics, considering how this saga threatens foundational journalistic integrity and the public trust in political institutions. Dyer emphasizes the obligation of those in power to respond to scrutiny constructively rather than defensively.
Dyer explains how Labour Together was formed and evolved after the 2019 general election, when it aimed to position itself favorably within the party post-Corbyn. Significant donations from wealthy individuals began to flow into Labour Together, although these contributions were not reported in accordance with electoral regulations. Dyer's past reports led to some exposure of these financial misdeeds, prompting the Electoral Commission to issue fines against Labour Together for late disclosures.
Fast forward to November 2023, the Sunday Times published a report revealing that Labour Together, under the direction of Josh Simons, had engaged in covert efforts against journalists, alleging without evidence that they were aligned with Russian interests. Dyer elaborates on the smear tactics employed against specific journalists, including baseless character attacks and personal mentions, which appeared aimed at discrediting their reporting. Dyer argues that such aggressive strategies from political entities against the press are dangerous to democratic processes.
The episode culminates in discussions surrounding the implications of these actions for Starmer's leadership and the wider ethics of philanthropy in politics, considering how this saga threatens foundational journalistic integrity and the public trust in political institutions. Dyer emphasizes the obligation of those in power to respond to scrutiny constructively rather than defensively.
Key Takeaways
- Labour Together commissioned a corporate intelligence firm to investigate journalists probing its funding, leading to unfounded allegations against them.
- The organization has faced scrutiny for late disclosure of significant donations, raising questions about transparency and accountability in political funding.
- The smear campaign against journalists illustrates deeper issues regarding the relationship between power and press freedom.
Found an issue with this summary?
Log in to Report IssueMore Podcast Insights
Newscast
By-Electioncast: Everything You Need To Know About Makerfield
May 22, 2026
The Diary Of A CEO with Steven Bartlett
Most Replayed Moment: AI Safety Expert Predicts The Next 20 Years! Will It Reall...
May 22, 2026
Dodge Woodall Network
Ask Dodge #8. Here's What Ai Can't Take From You as a Business Owner
May 22, 2026
RunPod
Paul Tonkinson: Comedian's Sahara Ultra Marathon
May 21, 2026