The confusing utility of Washington Sundar | Footmarks

The episode features a detailed discussion between Varun Alvakonda and Jarrod Kimber about Washington Sundar's confusing role in cricket, focusing on whether he is a better batting all-rounder or bowling all-rounder. Alvakonda expresses skepticism about Sundar's status as a frontline bowler in test cricket, while Kimber defends his versatility, suggesting he might excel as a seventh batter, but may not be suited as a top-order batter.

The hosts delve into Sundar's performance across formats, highlighting how in white-ball cricket, he takes a wicket per game and has a solid batting average, yet questions arise regarding his impact in test matches where he has not consistently bowled effectively or scored runs when needed at critical moments. They discuss how his potential is often undermined by the way teams choose to utilize him, questioning why he is played at numbers in the batting order that might not suit his abilities.

Additionally, they draw comparisons with well-known all-rounders like Ben Stokes and Jadeja, arguing that Sundar's role is not clearly defined, leading to inconsistent performances. They conclude that Washington Sundar's success might better be harnessed through clearer role definition and consistent batting positions as a sixth or seventh batter in tests and ODIs, while suggesting he should be utilized as a power hitter in T20 matches. The conversation wraps up with a collective hope that prospects for Sundar’s future will be clearer as he continues to develop.