Michelle Mone And The PPE Fine
by

Get the full episode insights!
Enter your email below to get notified about more insights from:
Newscast
This episode is titled:
Michelle Mone And The PPE Fine
Notable Quotes
"Hindsight's a wonderful thing. I wasn't trying to pull the wool over anyone's eyes."
"The behaviour depicted in this programme is reprehensible and completely unacceptable."

Get episode summaries just like this for all your favourite podcasts in your inbox every day!
Get More InsightsEpisode Summary
In this episode of Newscast, the hosts begin by reflecting on their recent experience at the Labour Party Conference, noting its chaotic environment and the need to return to their more acoustically controlled studio. The primary focus then shifts to a significant court case involving PPE MedPro, where a company tied to Baroness Michelle Moan was ordered to pay the UK government £122 million due to breaches related to unusable PPE gowns. The backstory is explored, detailing how the company came to supply the government during the early pandemic, the ensuing controversies, and the media scrutiny faced by Moan and her husband Doug Barrowman.
Laura Kunzberg, who has extensively covered this story, joins the discussion to unpack the timeline and implications of the court ruling. The conversation highlights how Moan admitted to certain lies regarding her involvement in PPE MedPro during an interview last December, complicating the narrative around her role and the procurement process during the pandemic. The judgment focused on contractual obligations rather than the political dimensions of the procurement process, which remains a hot topic in upcoming elections.
The latter part of the episode dives into serious allegations regarding the culture at Charing Cross Police Station, underscored by recent undercover work by Panorama revealing ongoing issues of racism, misogyny, and discriminatory behavior among officers. The Met's response to these findings is discussed, along with the potential for political pressure following public exposure of such misconduct. The episode concludes with reflections on the broader implications for policing in London and the systemic issues that seem resistant to change.
Laura Kunzberg, who has extensively covered this story, joins the discussion to unpack the timeline and implications of the court ruling. The conversation highlights how Moan admitted to certain lies regarding her involvement in PPE MedPro during an interview last December, complicating the narrative around her role and the procurement process during the pandemic. The judgment focused on contractual obligations rather than the political dimensions of the procurement process, which remains a hot topic in upcoming elections.
The latter part of the episode dives into serious allegations regarding the culture at Charing Cross Police Station, underscored by recent undercover work by Panorama revealing ongoing issues of racism, misogyny, and discriminatory behavior among officers. The Met's response to these findings is discussed, along with the potential for political pressure following public exposure of such misconduct. The episode concludes with reflections on the broader implications for policing in London and the systemic issues that seem resistant to change.
Key Takeaways
- The court ruled against PPE MedPro for supplying unusable gowns during the pandemic, ordering them to pay £122 million in damages.
- Baroness Michelle Moan admitted to lying about her involvement with PPE MedPro, complicating public perception of her role in the pandemic response.
- Undercover investigations revealed a toxic culture at Charing Cross Police Station, including racism and misogyny that persist despite claims of reform.
Found an issue with this summary?
Log in to Report Issue