Epstein files: has Trump really been ‘absolved’? – The Latest

In this episode, host Lucy Hough and Guardian columnist Jonathan Friedland examine the release of three million documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case, which raises serious questions about prominent figures including Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, and Prince Andrew. Trump's assertion that he is absolved of any allegations of sexual misconduct is based on the lack of credible accusations in these documents. The FBI did not consider the allegations serious enough to warrant further investigation, which Trump uses to claim he is exonerated.

However, the episode reveals that there are over 38,000 mentions of Trump and his associates in the released documents, and the incomplete nature of the release leaves doubts. Critics argue that those with suspicions about the existence of a broader conspiracy will remain unconvinced, especially since not all documents have been made public. Trump’s prior relationships with Epstein during the peak years of their friendship are also a point of concern.

The discussion then shifts to Prince Andrew, whose association with Epstein is particularly damaging, given the disturbing new evidence against him, including a compromising photograph and emails suggesting he continued ties with Epstein after his conviction. This evidence contradicts Andrew's claims about distancing himself from Epstein. The episode stresses the serious implications of these associations, drawing attention to the gravity of Epstein's legacy.

Finally, Lord Peter Mandelson's connections with Epstein are analyzed, focusing on his political activities and the troubling nature of his financial dealings. The episode underscores how Epstein's associations continue to tarnish the reputations of various public figures, suggesting a toxic legacy that permeates beyond his death. Overall, the conversation highlights the far-reaching ramifications of the Epstein case on those implicated.